If nonconforming goods are suspected, which action might a fraud examiner take after the fact?

• A. Ignore the issue
• B. Request assistance from outside technical personnel
• C. Terminate contract
• D. Increase order quantity

Answer: (B)

When nonconforming goods are suspected, bringing in outside technical personnel for evaluation is a key step in gathering objective, expert evidence. An independent specialist can perform tests, measurements, and analyses that internal staff might not be equipped to conduct, helping determine whether the goods truly fail to meet contract specs, industry standards, or quality requirements. This external input helps identify whether defects arose from manufacturing, handling, or supplier processes, and it preserves the integrity of the investigation by reducing potential bias. The findings provide credible documentation that supports further actions—such as supplier remediation, returns, or contract remedies—without prematurely drawing conclusions. Taking no action would leave possible fraud unexamined; acting to terminate or to increase orders without evidence could be harmful and unsound, respectively. So, requesting outside technical assistance is the best move to establish a solid factual basis before deciding next steps.